• Welcome!
    • About This Site
    • What Is It, And Why?
    • Provide Feedback
    • Go To Old Site
    • About Me
    • Who am I?
    • Curriculum Vitae (not current!)
    • LinkedIn
    • Professional page
    • More information ...
      • See top menu bar, "sean wilson"
  • Web Lectures
    • Help
    • What Are They?
    • Actual Courses
    • Constitutional Law I (govt powers)
      • How Do You Want To Search?
      • Use These Neat Menus
        • Introduction
        • Course Information
          • The Subject Matter
          • Course subject matter
          • Intro and warning about Part II
          • The Professor
          • Meet the professor
          • Teaching philosophy
          • The Course Rules
          • Final course paper
          • Exams, quizzes, etc.
          • Grades
          • Quality points
          • Student parliament
          • Helpful Advice
          • Briefing cases
          • Tips for success
          • Slide Methodology
          • Slide methodology
        • Development of American Constitutionalism
        • English History
          • The Medieval Political Order
          • Divine Right & Chain of Being
          • Religion and Society in the Middle Ages
          • Absolute Monarchy
          • Modernity Arrives in England
          • The Enlightenment & Reformation
          • Advantage on the High Seas
          • Violations in the Chain of Being
          • Glorious Revolution
          • The Financial Revolution
          • Rise of the Two-Party System
          • The First Modern Country?
        • The American Colonies
          • Intro
          • Spain, France & England in the New World
          • Introducing the new British colonies
          • "Specs"
          • Success: population & mercantilism
          • The mercantilist relationship
          • Colonial economy, population & government, etc.
        • Rebellion and Independence
          • Miscalculation
          • England loses the colonies
          • Taxation & Representation
          • Discussion: was it real or rhetoric?
          • They never wanted reprsentation
          • Separation
          • Becoming/declaring independence
        • Creating American Government
          • Early Experiments
          • Experiments in self governance
          • the Articles, failure and nationhood
          • The Constitution
          • The convention -- protocol and origin
          • The convention -- plans of government
          • Ratification of the new constitution
        • Inventing American Constitutionalism
          • What is 'Unconstitutional?'
          • James Otis & "constitutionality"
          • The Constitution's Theory of Design
          • Its philosophic significance
          • What it does to statutory power
          • The oil of the new machine: structured conflict
          • Parliamentary philosophy hidden within
          • But how democratic?
        • The Federalist Court
          • Background
          • Development of political parties
          • Supreme court -- the early years
          • Key Cases
          • Chisholm v. Georgia
          • Martin v. Hunter's lessee
          • McCullough v. Maryland
        • Judicial Review
          • Marbury v. Madison
          • Judiciary Act of 1789
          • The midnight judges)
          • The historic decision
          • Was it politics or law?
          • Judicial Review
          • Was it intended?
          • Why it created controversy
        • Growth of Federal Power
        • Limited Government?
          • Introduction
          • Why the issue is problematic
          • "Simon says" Uncle Sam cannot do that
          • What is "regulating commerce" anyway?
          • The "Regimes"
          • John Marshall (Federalists)
            • Gibbons
            • The facts
            • The issue
            • The ruling
            • Brown v. Maryland
            • Open package rule
          • Roger Taney (Anti-Federalist)
            • Intro
            • Who is Roger Taney?
            • Key Contributions
            • Miln: state police powers
            • Dormant commerce power (cooley, license cases)
          • Laissez Faire
            • What Caused It?
            • Social transformation, late 1800s
            • Early Commerce Decisions
            • E.C. Knight (protecting Goliath)
            • Hammer v. Dagenhart (allowing child labor)
            • The effect of these rulings
            • How a laissez faire commerce clause would read
            • Taxation Decisions
            • McCray v. US (taxes can regulate?)
            • Bailey v. Drexel Furniture (but can't penalize?)
            • U.S. v. Butler (taxes CAN'T regulate)
            • Butler as regime politics
            • "Substantive Due Process"
            • Blunting the states,too
            • Killing the New Deal
            • Schechter Poultry(the final straw)
            • Schechter's significance; FDR's reaction
            • Carter v. Carter Coal (the last stand)
            • The "Four Horseman" (mischief makers)
          • FDR and Beyond
            • Roosevelt's Significance
            • Great depression and capitalism's failure
            • The New Deal arrives
            • "Switch in Time"
            • The court packing plan
            • West Coast Hotel (ending substantive due process)
            • Owens and why he switched his vote
            • NLRB (ending commerce doctrines)
            • Discussion: NLRB, law and politics
            • Meet the New Boss
            • Wickard -- to infinity and beyond
            • Motivation test abolished
            • )Outlawing discrimination with the commerce clause
            • Do we have a Parliamentary system now?
          • The Rehnquist Court
            • David Strikes Goliath
            • Lopez (the first shot)
            • Morrison (entering the danger zone?)
            • David Walks Away
            • Raich, retreat and why?
          • The Big Picture
          • Is the commerce fiction good or bad?
        • The Power of Institutions
        • Emergency Powers
          • Legal v. "Extra-Legal"
          • What's the difference?
          • "Legal" Emergency Power
            • Suspending Habeas Corpus
            • Ex Parte Milligan (when can you suspend habeas?)
            • Revoking the Court's Jurisdiction
            • Ex Parte McCardle
            • The limits upon revoking jurisdiction
          • "Extra-legal" Emergency Power
            • The President's Prerogative
            • Lincoln, law, war and power
            • The Prize Cases (presidents come first)
            • Quirin and Nazi terrorists
            • The Captures Clause (why Quirin didn't raise it)
            • Japanese internment (social context)
            • Japanese internment ("the final solution")
            • Structuring This Power
            • The Youngstown case (facts)
            • Youngstown's solution: don't ignore statutes
            • the Dames and Moore idea: watch existing laws
            • Hamdi and the due process ritual
            • Hamdan and propping up Congress
        • Presidential Power
          • Theorizing About
          • There are three epochs of power
          • Epoch I (the framer's presidency)
          • Epoch II (the American Caesar?)
          • Epoch III (reigning in Caesar)
          • Is liberal legal culture threatening Article II??
          • Development Of
          • Evolution of power and role
          • views about in the 1900s
          • Curtiss-Wright (rhetoric)
          • Example of implied power: executive agreements
          • The Rule of Law
          • Above the law? (pardons, imeachment)
          • Investigations, lawsuits, exec. priv
          • Starting War
          • Who really has the power?
        • Role of Court in American Government
          • Philosophic Issue
          • Hamilton versus "jurocracy"
          • Examples In This Course
          • What do civil war cases say about it?
          • What does Korematsu say about it?
          • Is the Court beholden to hegemony?
      • View chronological-order page
      • View topical-index page
    • Supreme Court Decision Making
      • How Do You Want To Search?
      • Use These Neat Menus
        • Introduction
        • Course Information
          • The Subject Matter
          • Jurisprudence, Behaviorism & Orthodoxy
          • Teaching approach (philosophical)
          • The Professor
          • Who is the professor?
          • The Course Rules
          • Exams, quizzes and more
          • Helpful Advice
          • Tips for success
          • Your first quiz
          • Advice for paper
          • Help with the paper
          • Slide Methodology
          • Slide methodology
        • Must Know Beforehand
        • Philosophic terminology
        • Development of Legal Epistemology
        • From Antquity Through the 1700s
          • Development of Statututory Power
          • Difference between statutes and precedents
          • How power over statutes developed
          • Roman example: might makes right?
          • Monarchy: to share or not to share statutes?
          • Rise of Common Law
          • Historical development in England
          • History and ideology of
          • Example of the orthodoxy (tipping)
          • The Great Conundrum
          • Bonham's case: who is the boss?
          • What are the foundations of judging?
          • Difference between positivism and natural law
          • Introduction to jurisprudence & cognition
          • Summary and review of the basis of legality
          • America's Contribution
          • "Privatizing" religion
          • New rationalization for statutory power
          • Codification of fundamental law
          • Lowering the rank of common law
          • Judging is "special"
          • The big loophole: Ninth Amendment
        • From 1800s to the Present
          • The American Legal Debate
          • Classical Legal Thought
            • What Is It?
            • Introduction
            • Langdell, Blackstone & "science"
            • Examples (Using "Logic")
            • Marbury v. Madison (the great syllogism)
            • McCullough v. Maryland (introduction)
            • If McCullough Hadn't Used Classicism
            • Did Marshall use logic or ideology?
            • Examples (Using Tradition)
            • Is it ok to use "tradition" to decide cases?
            • Was Brandwell tradition or ideology?
            • Understanding The "A Priori" Format
            • Wynehammer and the "a priori"
          • Holmes/"Realists"
            • The Conundrum Returns
            • What is the foundation of legal judging?
            • The rebellion against classicism
            • Summary of the Holmesian critique
            • Examples of Holmes' Critique
            • The Lochner majority (classicism's last stand)
            • The Lochner dissent ("quit faking")
            • The Realists and Realism
            • Who are "The Realists?"
          • "Sociological Jurisprudence"
            • What Is It?
            • Policy by statutes and empiricism
            • New solution: law as a growth science?
            • Real Examples Of
            • Brown v. Bd. of Education
            • Brown v. Board (a summary)
            • Was Brown "ideological?"
            • When is a decision 'ideological?'
            • Hypothetical Examples Of
            • Speed Traps
            • Gay marriage
            • War on terror
            • Critique Of
            • The flaws of this approach
            • Decline Of
            • Death and decline
          • Positivism
            • What Is It?
            • Introduction to; definition of
            • Summary of positivism
            • Significance Of
            • Implications for morality, international law
            • judging is reading
            • Development Of
            • Development into a regime ideology
            • Examples Of
            • The Tom Brady fumble
            • Riggs v. Palmer (class discussion)
            • Riggs v. Palmer (the decision)
            • Neal v. US (sentencing guidelines)
            • Neal v. US (weight of the drugs)
            • Neal v. US (discussion: why follow stupid laws?)
            • Neal v. US (the idiot's decision)
            • Critique of
            • Excess legalism in culture?
            • Problems with this approach to judging
            • Summary: why follow bad rules?
            • If Law is Indeterminate?
            • Introduction
              • Introduction
              • Aren't most legal rules unclear?
              • Solutions for Unclear language
              • Summary of Solutions
              • Positivism's solutions for indeterminacy
            • Solutions
              • Three Different Schools
              • Originalism
                • What Is It?
                • Originalism v. neo-originalism
                • Original intent (speaker's meaning)
                • Problems With
                • Failings of Speaker's Meaning)
                • "Law" is not your intentions
              • "Analytic" Positivism
                • What Is It?
                • Using rules to read for you
                • A judicial reading machine?
                • Caution: this only a philosophic exercise
                • The Canons of Construction
                • Rules of reading
                • Supporting Literal Semantics
                • Reading canons support literalism
                • Supporting Equitable Results
                • Canons for good results
                • Example of canonical 'realism'
              • "Inductive" Positivism
                • What Is It?
                • Finding essences "behind" words
                • An Example
                • Griswold v. Connecticut
          • Skepticism
            • What Is It?
            • Introduction to deconstruction
            • As a teaching tool v. orthodoxy
            • What it does to "law"
            • Learning the "buzz words"
            • Word pairs for world views?
            • Applications of
            • Two kinds: external v. internal
            • Argument from hallucination
            • "Fundamental contradiction" (Duncan Kennedy fallacy)
        • Original Thoughts About These Problems
        • Re-conceptualizing Jurisprudence
          • Organizing the Approaches
          • Summary of basic approaches
          • Relating Them to Cognition
          • The "Kantian" influence on the mind)
          • Seeing is believing
          • Desires are what rules
          • Three dimensions to semantics?
          • Implications for "Law"
          • "Law" is a cognitive recipe?
          • Integrity versus ideology?
        • Social Science's Ideas
        • Theories of decision making
        • Who Are The Justices
          • Introduction
          • Justices and "liberal ratings"
          • By Appointing President
          • Roosevelt appointees
          • Truman appointees
          • Eisenhower appointees
          • Kennedy and Johnson appointees
          • Nixon and Ford appointees
          • Current-Era Members
          • The current appointees
        • It's all Just "Ideology"
          • A Troubling Idea
          • What is "Ideology?"
            • Introduction
            • Class discussion: what is it?
            • Selecting a unit of analysis
            • What "ideology" means
            • Subject Matter of Beliefs?
            • Lexicography of exemplar subjects in politics
            • Lexicographic typology of exemplars in politics
            • Discussion: "atmospheric" postulates
            • The Court decides non-exemplars?
            • Discussion: what if judges have high scores?
            • Justification for Beliefs?
            • Criticism/observation of epistemology
            • Discussion: when epistemology is the unit of analysis
            • Application of Beliefs?
            • Intro to casuistry
            • Underlying Motivation (Passions)?
            • Deficient brain state (bias)
            • Attitudes and cognition
            • Social Consequences of Beliefs?
            • Rationalizing clients
          • Using this idea
            • Who Uses It?
            • Rush Limbaugh
            • Spock and David Gergan
            • Pat Buchanan
            • Boils down to art appreciation?
            • A Meaningless Idea?
            • Follow/not follow is meaningless?
          • Empirical evidence for
            • Introduction
            • Dockets, Ratings & issues
            • Career Liberal Ratings
            • For different subject areas
            • Problems with, significance of
            • Newspaper Reputation Scores
            • Segal/Cover scores
            • The Paltry Relationship
            • The newspaper-reputation model
        • It's Strategy
          • Game Theory
          • Explaining game theory
          • Example Of
          • Street v. New York
        • It's Generational Regimes
          • What Is It?
          • Intro to regime theory
          • Is It True?
          • According to career ratings?
          • Specific issue: search-and-seizure
          • Is It Bad?
          • The ethics of regime theory
        • No, It's Structuralism
          • What Is Structuralism?
          • Introduction
          • Thinking as negating (derived from Karl Popper)
          • Dworkin: structured discretion and concept of law
          • Dworkin: chain novels, integrity, hercules, correct answers
          • Relating It to Cognition
          • Three dimensions of brain cognition (triangle)
          • Fit within a theory of cognition
          • Implications for "Law"
          • implication for jurisprudence, ties to neo-institutionalism
          • Example Of
          • Flag burning -- an introduction
          • Flag burning -- background cases
          • Flag burning -- Scalia/Kennedy as principled
          • Flag burning -- Rehnquist dissent as value laden
          • Evidence For
          • Core political speech
      • View chronological-order page
      • View topical-index page
    • Politics of Trials and Litigation
      • How Do You Want To Search?
      • Use These Neat Menus
        • Introduction
        • Course Information
          • What Is The Course About?